July 21, 2007 - 5:53am
News

Will Rivera-Soto be reappointed in 2011?

Roberto Rivera-Soto, the first New Jersey Supreme Court Justice to be censured in state history, was effectively slapped on the wrist by his top court colleagues -- he gets to keep his job.  But that doesn't mean he'll be there forever: Governor Jon "Zero Tolerance" Corzine, or his successor, could opt to not reappoint him to what would become a tenured term on the Supreme Court, in 2011.  That would also make Rivera-Soto the first Justice under the current State Constitution to not be reappointed.

Wally Edge can be reached via email at politicsnj@aol.com.

Comments

Rivera-Soto


Well, Jon "Empty Suit" Corzine won't have to worry about that because He won't be around.

Hopefully he will be sent back to where he came from that Cesspool/Liberal capitol of the word Illinois.

07/21/07 7:21 am

Rivera-Soto


He'll probably get reappointed and wont resign. The Republicans in the NJ Senate are so self-centered that they can be bought with a "Christmas Tree" item to bring home the bacon, or with an appointment of a worthless son-in-law to a high paid job. This NJ GOP needs to clean house, starting with Tom Wilson.

"I am a firm believer in the people.  If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis.  The great point is to bring them the real facts."  - Abraham Lincoln

07/21/07 8:48 am

What Republicans?


I didn't know there were any Republicans in the State Senate.

07/21/07 9:36 am

I agree with MadMax...


Let's not get too far ahead of ourselves here. Jon Corzine will have a lot of explaining to do to the voters come 2009.

07/21/07 5:52 pm

doubtful


Since Rivera-Soto is also the most conservative member of the court, Corzine could (and likely will) use this snafu to justify appointing a different (and more liberal) Republican.

Bob Martin and Leonard Lance....dust off your resumes in '11.

07/23/07 9:10 am

Why Isn't This Impeachable?


I suspect that in a place like New Hampshire or Vermont this would have been a truly major scandal.

Surely, the legislature has the legal right to hold Judges accountable for ethical lapses and rules violations!

On the other hand, is it in the interests of this legislature to set the bar truly high in re ethics?

 

From Frederick Douglass

If there is no struggle there is no progress......Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.

07/23/07 1:01 pm