August 13, 2008 - 3:09pm
News

Healy to Fulop: let's make a deal

Although Jersey City Municipal Clerk Robert Byrne has sided with the city against one of Councilman Steve Fulop’s ballot initiatives, the signatures for hi anti-pay-to-play intiative,were certified today.

But that initiative might not make it on the ballot after all if Mayor Jerramiah Healy has his way, depriving Fulop of a chance to make his case directly to the voters of Jersey City.

Healy wrote a letter today to Byrne, members of the city council and Fulop’s legal team proposing an amendment to Fulop’s pay-to-play initiative.

The amendment would require candidates to file personal financial disclosures when entering a race. If the candidate is running against someone who makes $500,000 a year or who has a net worth of $2 million or more, then the rules set forth in Fulop’s initiative that bans pay-to-play do not apply.

“While pay-to-play regulations such as the initiative currently before the City Council seek to eliminate the appearance of favoritism in the awarding of government contracts by limiting political contributions from contract awardees, an unintended consequence is that they create a disadvantage to candidates of modest means,” wrote Healy, who said that such rules “only exacerbate the disadvantage of these non-wealthy candidates.”

If Fulop agrees to the amendment and the city council passes it, then it won’t have to be on the ballot in November. But Fulop, who’s laying the groundwork for a mayoral bid next year, will want that initiative to remain on the ballot.

It’s Fulop’s call, but the mayor will be able to frame a rejection as Fulop favoring rich candidates.

“We hold the cards now, is really what it comes down to,” said Fulop.

Fulop said he’ll consider Healy’s amendment – once Healy decides to do something about city council members taking more than one public salary.

“I got his letter, and my initial take is that, in my experiences with Jerry Healy he has never kept his word about anything,” said Fulop So there is a trust issue as always. My goal and the petitioners’ goal is a better Jersey City. I’ll discuss it with the other petitioners and we’ll go from there. But the way Jerry Healy has handled the salary situation certainly jeopardizes any trust.”

“We will consider the amendment when he considers our amendment that there’s no double dipping on that council.”

MATT FRIEDMAN is a PolitickerNJ.com Reporter and can be reached via email at matt@politicsnj.com.
Related topics: Steve Fulop, Jerramiah Healy

Comments

not a bad idea, but


too little, too late.

matsikoudis may have been correct, but handled it completely ineptly. he should have brought up the 12,000 signature requirement months ago, when fulop was just getting started. look how long it took to get 3000 signatures - he never would have made the ballot for november anyway. now, it looks like a sleazy move (looks like? is!) that puts the clerk in the middle unfairly and sets up a david and goliath scenario that makes fulop look good no matter what happens.

good one, billy.

08/13/08 9:08 pm

Why not


If they would have told him to get them than those fanatics would have got them,it's not that hard.The fulop people were stupid and lazy.Stupid for taking the citys word for it and lazy for not getting 10,000 signatures just for the Data base of voters it would have given them.Live and learn.There's no crying in Politics,only spin.

08/13/08 11:20 pm

Not that easy


I saw those people collect Signatures in all parts of the city, almost everyday of the week. They were at all the block parties, all the festivals, press releases. They were everywhere!

They were not stupid or lazy. That's a harsh comment to say about people who took their spare time and used it to (try to?) make a difference.

08/14/08 8:20 am